4th November 2012, 04:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 5th November 2012, 04:36 PM by Bodger51.)
The problem it appears we are trying to tackle with the pay grades works on the basis of restructuring the heritage sector.
By and large this comes down to wether the work is undertaken to privately fill a nieche, publicly provide a service of data accumulation (exponential) for interest purposes, educationally improve the cognition required to compile said data and then predominantly negotiate the dynamical structure we are parts of.
The principle issue exists at the Small scale of the SME, where accrued debts and profit appear on balance sheets as liminal market outliers of significance to bank managers, whilst the clustered incidents of such businesses formulate standards in high risk competition states on balance sheets.
The issues arise when profit is amassed to offset, or extract company dividends.
The ethics within this are generally based upon cultural character norms and individualised pressured character factors.
It is at this point you have the disjuncture between the interests of public interest data accumulations and operational culture operatives.
So in returning to pay grades the IFA plays the role of professional interest in negotiating between Prospect and FAME.
The removal of the IfA removes this element to restructural sector politics in garnering support etc.
Conversely this then asks the IfA if their position is vocally apparent 'to' and 'for' whom.
This introduces the Prospect debate where there is disquiet about whom is represented.
Admittedly, at this point the only sector quiet at this stage is the educational aspect, whilst it being based within University facilities would belie that to being 'silent/observational/omnipotence'.
This is especially apparent when research remains outside of the norm interests, or worth while vocal participation when there are inter-departmental publication competitions.
Its almost like their just abscent but whilst perpetually represented.
Anyways.
Now to move on about whom has the right.
whose interested in talking about balance sheets, overheads, margins and strategy?
Anyone?
My bet is not.
By and large this comes down to wether the work is undertaken to privately fill a nieche, publicly provide a service of data accumulation (exponential) for interest purposes, educationally improve the cognition required to compile said data and then predominantly negotiate the dynamical structure we are parts of.
The principle issue exists at the Small scale of the SME, where accrued debts and profit appear on balance sheets as liminal market outliers of significance to bank managers, whilst the clustered incidents of such businesses formulate standards in high risk competition states on balance sheets.
The issues arise when profit is amassed to offset, or extract company dividends.
The ethics within this are generally based upon cultural character norms and individualised pressured character factors.
It is at this point you have the disjuncture between the interests of public interest data accumulations and operational culture operatives.
So in returning to pay grades the IFA plays the role of professional interest in negotiating between Prospect and FAME.
The removal of the IfA removes this element to restructural sector politics in garnering support etc.
Conversely this then asks the IfA if their position is vocally apparent 'to' and 'for' whom.
This introduces the Prospect debate where there is disquiet about whom is represented.
Admittedly, at this point the only sector quiet at this stage is the educational aspect, whilst it being based within University facilities would belie that to being 'silent/observational/omnipotence'.
This is especially apparent when research remains outside of the norm interests, or worth while vocal participation when there are inter-departmental publication competitions.
Its almost like their just abscent but whilst perpetually represented.
Anyways.
Now to move on about whom has the right.
whose interested in talking about balance sheets, overheads, margins and strategy?
Anyone?
My bet is not.