28th December 2012, 02:48 PM
I read through the consulation document on my travels and was taken aback by the no time frame element ascribed to the telescoping phase.
In the abscence of a time frame, it merely stands to bring an end to BAJR through a determined commitment.
Admittedly, the pay commitments is reliant upon the positions of the employing bodies, but the only thing holding this back is the character of either judgement or action being the services (and product) provided.
Judgement easier to deliver, but holds a self fulfilling condition to it.
I am however suprised by the makeup of the IfA, in numerical distribution terms.
I think we are still struggling over the supervisor conditioning factors, to be able to make clear distinctions on what judgement can be provided and delivered in the realtime of data collection
In the abscence of a time frame, it merely stands to bring an end to BAJR through a determined commitment.
Admittedly, the pay commitments is reliant upon the positions of the employing bodies, but the only thing holding this back is the character of either judgement or action being the services (and product) provided.
Judgement easier to deliver, but holds a self fulfilling condition to it.
I am however suprised by the makeup of the IfA, in numerical distribution terms.
I think we are still struggling over the supervisor conditioning factors, to be able to make clear distinctions on what judgement can be provided and delivered in the realtime of data collection