31st January 2013, 01:38 PM
Well there we have it... a curates egg, but indeed a result ( thanks to all that helped ensure this was not a collapse of the system )
So lets take this and learn from it... find a way to move it forward and not let this slip.
I just need a clarification on a couple of points. and will seek them..
Until then... BAJR is very happy to see the 13/14 rates fall broadly into the IfA rates. and we will continue to hold the line as well. Accepting no posts that do not pay more than the minima.
So lets take this and learn from it... find a way to move it forward and not let this slip.
I just need a clarification on a couple of points. and will seek them..
Quote:Council additionally resolved that IfA’s Jobs Information Service will not accept paid advertisements for archaeological posts that do not comply with the recommended minima.Does this include ROs that do not pay for adverts?
Quote:This is disappointing, but Council believes that other, more effective mechanisms can be found.For example? AS this does seem to be, we don't know yet, but I am sure something will turn up. Would it not have been wiser to wait until this mechanism was in place?
Until then... BAJR is very happy to see the 13/14 rates fall broadly into the IfA rates. and we will continue to hold the line as well. Accepting no posts that do not pay more than the minima.