25th February 2013, 11:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 25th February 2013, 11:11 AM by Unitof1.)
by heck commercial archaeology seems to have been good for diggers in ni. I dont see how publication would get them any more money or security of employment. be interesting to know what bob thinks about diggers copyrights as he seems to be of a literary bent with a bit of eye on academic table.
might be a bit left field but woke up to hear of The death of this person
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Cusick
and the sometime repeated story of being on a salary and not getting a royalty as such. I cant help think that this is yet another example of the problem of being in a public service paradiam. I also think that it is the biggest problem that anybody has with publishing on archaeological material. unlike the bbc we dont have a statewide manopoly with the tax rasing rights to criminalise anybod that does not pay although there still the similarity to rip off the workers.
might be a bit left field but woke up to hear of The death of this person
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Cusick
and the sometime repeated story of being on a salary and not getting a royalty as such. I cant help think that this is yet another example of the problem of being in a public service paradiam. I also think that it is the biggest problem that anybody has with publishing on archaeological material. unlike the bbc we dont have a statewide manopoly with the tax rasing rights to criminalise anybod that does not pay although there still the similarity to rip off the workers.
Reason: your past is my past