Cartoon does the penny not drop. Just what of any of the thousands of context sheets filled in is "worth" archiving. Who will judge? Because you dont see it as copyright and how to utilise copyright to preserve ...copyright, you have no way of judging how to preserve anything 0r what to disseminate to where or why. These are economic problems but so called museum archaeologists dont see their assets in economic terms. As a result the majority of their so called archaeological archives are crap and just generate economic losses to the "public".
All these so called museum archaeologists are doing is organising a beggars convention and they want lots more money from tax because thats where public servants make their pensions. To an individual these museum archaeologists are public servants, their problem is economic, do they really want my copyright well pay me for it. What you would find is yes cartoon is most/all of it nobody wants. BUT currently these stupid public servants have no way of working out if they want it and I would stop producing what they dont want and start producing something that they might want. And yes I dont know what that might be but I know that it will be copyright.
All these so called museum archaeologists are doing is organising a beggars convention and they want lots more money from tax because thats where public servants make their pensions. To an individual these museum archaeologists are public servants, their problem is economic, do they really want my copyright well pay me for it. What you would find is yes cartoon is most/all of it nobody wants. BUT currently these stupid public servants have no way of working out if they want it and I would stop producing what they dont want and start producing something that they might want. And yes I dont know what that might be but I know that it will be copyright.
Quote:A recent initiative between the Federation of Archaeological Managers and Employers (FAME), the Society of Museum Archaeologists (SMA) and the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers (ALGAO) has sought to foster a greater level of collaborative working within archaeology and the museums profession to resolve the issue and to establish a proper level of care for archaeological archives within the UK while at the same time maximising their value to both the professional and amateur/voluntary sectors alike by increasing access to them and encouraging innovative research based upon them.So how this works is that ALGaO goes around putting conditions on planning applications and to jusify their conditions treat everything that FAME can get out of the landowners as archaeologically "significant" and to prove it ALGaO need SMA to prove that it is significant by them archiving the loads of crap produced in the name of archaeology in something called a museum. Its facinating that at every step they have somebody calling themselves an archaeologists although you will see very little evidence of living by the trowel. Its a throw back to when they all worked in the same government office with eh. It would be interesting to know how many people are in SMA are also in ALGaO.
Reason: your past is my past