20th March 2013, 05:24 PM
amiable drudge Wrote:which can be challenged and re-interpreted by anyone who comes along and reads our openly accessible archive, where we've showed our working-out. try comprehending what i've effing-well said, rather than being needlessly bone-headedly 'provocative'.you said 'our goal' and i will bone-headedly contend that it is unachievable because we start interpreting before trowel touches mud and everything else may well be accessably archived but the site is effing effed.
but other than that i dont think all view points are equally valid, other than all religasists being equally deluded
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers