Thanks wolfy
As far as I can work it out there was a statuate back in 1965 and then there was another one in 1986 and this is how it mentions archaeology and it has to be said that archaeology is something that is only very rearely mentioned in statutary law:
to wit the functions of the "board"
it seems to me that it is a function of the board to provide archaeological services. It does not seem to me that it is a function of the board to produce charities.
but this is when it gets gowwee because you can go through the whole act and find no mention that any enterty mentioned in the act is to be considered a "charity"
so my fellow time travellers how come the museum of London has registered "its" self as a shiRtty chaRity. By what act of parliament.?
And then there is the section on where the dosh should come from and there is no mention of "loans" which all the charity accouynts are littered with
which comes after the fianace bit which says
Rescue if you have any gumption take who ever to court and sharf them. Mr Woodbridge have you any thoughts on all this charitiesing and who has the authority to do so?
I desperatly need help on this one folks
Quote:MOLA (Museum of London Archaeology) has now become an independent charityIts an interesting game how something that once was, becomes something that now is. Is it not. but whaT IS AN INDEPENDANT charity. How is that different to a charity for charities sake. Are these people desperate or what.
As far as I can work it out there was a statuate back in 1965 and then there was another one in 1986 and this is how it mentions archaeology and it has to be said that archaeology is something that is only very rearely mentioned in statutary law:
to wit the functions of the "board"
Quote:(2)The Board may, subject to the provisions of this Act, do all such things as they think necessary or expedient for those purposes and their functions under this Act.
(3)Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (2) above, for the purposes mentioned in subsection(1) above the Board may-”
(a)provide archaeological services and undertake archaeological investigations and research in connection with land in London, publish information concerning such investigations and research and promote the provision of such services and the undertaking of such investigations and research and the publishing of such information;
it seems to me that it is a function of the board to provide archaeological services. It does not seem to me that it is a function of the board to produce charities.
but this is when it gets gowwee because you can go through the whole act and find no mention that any enterty mentioned in the act is to be considered a "charity"
so my fellow time travellers how come the museum of London has registered "its" self as a shiRtty chaRity. By what act of parliament.?
And then there is the section on where the dosh should come from and there is no mention of "loans" which all the charity accouynts are littered with
Quote:Funding of Greater London archaeological service.
(1)The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England may make grants to the Board of Governors of the Museum of London for the purpose of assisting the Board in providing archaeological services and undertaking archaeological investigations and research in connection with land in London and publishing information concerning such investigations and research or in promoting the provision of such services or the undertaking of such investigations and research or the publishing of such information by another body or person
(2)A grant under this section may be made subject to such conditions as the Commission think fit to impose.
(3)In this section “Londonâ€Â includes all Greater London and the surrounding region.
(4)In section 14(1) of the M1Museum of London Act 1965 (general obligation on Board to apply moneys received by them otherwise than as mentioned in paragraphs (a) to © to defray general administrative expenses) after paragraph © there shall be inserted the words “or
(d)under section 4 of the Museum of London Act 1986Â.
which comes after the fianace bit which says
Quote:3 Funding of general expenses in respect of Museum.
(1)In section 15(3) of the M1Museum of London Act 1965 (payment of the expenses of the Corporation of the City of London in respect of the Museum as to one-third out of moneys provided by Parliament and one-third by the Greater London Council)”
(a)for the words "the Secretary of State out of moneys provided by Parliament, and the Greater London Council shall each pay to the Corporation a sum equal to one-third there shall be substituted the words " the Secretary of State shall pay to the corporation out of moneys provided by Parliament a sum equal to one-halfÂ; and
(b)for the words "the Corporation, the Secretary of State and the Greater London Council"Â there shall be substituted the words " the Corporation and the Secretary of State"Â.
(2)Section 43(4) of the M2Local Government Act 1985 (which makes provision concerning the funding of expenses in respect of the Museum and is superseded by this section) shall not have effect.
Rescue if you have any gumption take who ever to court and sharf them. Mr Woodbridge have you any thoughts on all this charitiesing and who has the authority to do so?
I desperatly need help on this one folks
Reason: your past is my past