26th March 2014, 05:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 26th March 2014, 05:56 AM by John Wells.)
Kevin is most likely right. I have removed my last entry to avoid eliciting an eristical response, especially based on misunderstanding!
I have never come across such a poorly represented body of disparate workers (ie outside any professional organisation), that appear so distrustful, argumentative and cannot see a potentially good thing when it is starring them in the face.
Which professional bodies have reduced their effectiveness and lowered standards, and the prospects of their members, by becoming Chartered?
But I probably presume too much in offering my observations on the nature and function of Chartered professional bodies, especially in this case, as I am not an archaeologist.
I have never come across such a poorly represented body of disparate workers (ie outside any professional organisation), that appear so distrustful, argumentative and cannot see a potentially good thing when it is starring them in the face.
Which professional bodies have reduced their effectiveness and lowered standards, and the prospects of their members, by becoming Chartered?
But I probably presume too much in offering my observations on the nature and function of Chartered professional bodies, especially in this case, as I am not an archaeologist.