30th July 2013, 11:42 PM
hosty it appears to come across as html source code and makes it hard to read.
under polluter pays and archaeology is pollution and therefore what we produce is pollution, which nobody wants to pay anything for, unless money comes from somewhere why should the public be engaged in commercial archaeology?-no challenge necessary. What business is it of somebody from ucl. Maybe we should be taking the mickle out of some pathetic post doc subject. From what I can ascertain this person got into archaeology by doing one of those MAs after some undergraduate
PhD funded through employment (British Museum and UCL)MA, Public Archaeology, UCL, 2006
Cert Ed (QTS), University of Plymouth, 2003
BA, Fine Art (Printmaking), Loughborough College of Art, 1989
what does that tool think of this persons digging skills?
under polluter pays and archaeology is pollution and therefore what we produce is pollution, which nobody wants to pay anything for, unless money comes from somewhere why should the public be engaged in commercial archaeology?-no challenge necessary. What business is it of somebody from ucl. Maybe we should be taking the mickle out of some pathetic post doc subject. From what I can ascertain this person got into archaeology by doing one of those MAs after some undergraduate
PhD funded through employment (British Museum and UCL)MA, Public Archaeology, UCL, 2006
Cert Ed (QTS), University of Plymouth, 2003
BA, Fine Art (Printmaking), Loughborough College of Art, 1989
what does that tool think of this persons digging skills?
Reason: your past is my past