5th May 2015, 12:39 PM
Why are the DF being the name? why can't the cIFA be the name? what difference does it make? either way no name of the complainant is put forward. I would expect an organisation that wishes to uphold standards in archaeology to be able to pursue a complaint in its own name.
There is much that can be investigated without a complainants name being involved.
There is much that can be investigated without a complainants name being involved.