26th August 2013, 11:52 AM
archaeologyexile Wrote:hmmm absolutely but the problem is that too much archaeology is done with negative results and too much is done that really isn't worth the candle! In Scotland 70% of all interventions have negative results and of the positive results half are not worth it.....this is far too much! lets do less but do it better!Are there many parts of Britain where you could guarantee there is no archaeology without some form of investigation? That would seem rather a dangerous assumption to me. But then I am new to this game.