26th August 2013, 08:29 PM
OK, to change the question slightly, is there any way in which you can predict with 95+% certainty that those 70% of sites that produce negative results would have nowt before intervention? And isn't it, in some ways, as important to prove there is nothing rather than something if you're talking about development sites? Or have I got the wrong idea that having some kind of archaeology aspect in the planning law was to make sure information isn't lost, not necessarily to find stuff each time?
Apologies if that isn't worded particularly well - celebrating a rare day off with some very cheap wine. It's for medicinal purposes, honest...
Apologies if that isn't worded particularly well - celebrating a rare day off with some very cheap wine. It's for medicinal purposes, honest...