8th November 2013, 07:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 8th November 2013, 07:27 PM by GnomeKing.)
BAJR Wrote:. part of the criteria would be publication of work done -
i like the sentiment
BUT:
it is already hard enough for people to get breaks in "Report Writting"
(+ copyright#....)
--- such a sceme could matters far worse, with report witting being jealously hoarded........(.>>> & clearly interpretation and perspective could be even more limited than they already are)
AND:
who decides what constitutes a sufficient report vs an oustanding report vs incompetent ramblings......?
(well obviously peer and community review would be best, but how?
>>> if potentials of digital documents/digital communities are realised better, + there are publicly available commercial reports/interim statments done in timely fashion, then maybe there are ways to 'open' the problem of who decides...)