8th November 2013, 10:32 PM
Tool Wrote:More to the point, maybe we're all ignoring the fundamental problems, in that this industry is just a bit-part player in a far wider political, social and economic story in which archaeology exerts less than a tenuous influence. Now, if we had a body that actively engaged with both practitioners of archaeology and the wider public to bring this subject that we all care about into the debate about planning law, identity, the importance of knowledge and learning, whilst also promoting best practice and best employment conditions, then maybe we'd all jump on board. Rather more important than dictating what grade pencil is used to produce a section drawing?these are all issues that the ifa is trying to address. members have their own agenda but a consensus is a compromise. it does need more digger voters.
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers