13th February 2014, 11:22 AM
I suspect that those archaeologists who have stayed separate from the IfA will also stay separate from the CIfA. That is their choice. British employment law currently makes it impossible for the CIfA to promote or enforce a closed shop on behalf of its members. Whether Chartered status gives any company or individual a fair competitive advantage remains to be seen.
I think however that this moment is a now a watershed in UK archaeology (and possibly world archaeology) as the IfA becomes the first body in archaeology to gain official status as a recognised professional organisation. I would be the last to suggest that the CIfA is perfect, but for those suggesting that its lacks an authority to act on behalf of the profession, the argument is over. I guess the challenge is now for those of us who are members to work towards the organisation more accurately representing the aspirations of archaeology and the needs of UK archaeology. Hopefully in time that will bring some of the doubters into the fold.
I thinks its wrong to suggest that every member of the CIfA is tarred with the same brush....
I think however that this moment is a now a watershed in UK archaeology (and possibly world archaeology) as the IfA becomes the first body in archaeology to gain official status as a recognised professional organisation. I would be the last to suggest that the CIfA is perfect, but for those suggesting that its lacks an authority to act on behalf of the profession, the argument is over. I guess the challenge is now for those of us who are members to work towards the organisation more accurately representing the aspirations of archaeology and the needs of UK archaeology. Hopefully in time that will bring some of the doubters into the fold.
I thinks its wrong to suggest that every member of the CIfA is tarred with the same brush....
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...