20th February 2014, 02:17 PM
kevin wooldridge Wrote:But in countries which have statutory protection for archaeology (such as Norway) the imperative lies with the planning authority to consult with the archaeological regulator/curator. I don't see why that wouldn't work here in the UK. It would remove the need for archaeology to be chasing the lowest price denominator and remove any suggestion of collusion between the developer and their 'pet' archaeologist. It currently works fine where planning authorities are required by law to include an EIA as part of the planning regimen. Why not with archaeology as well? Having decided that archaeology is necessary the archaeological regulator/curator sets the tender price and the developer is obligated to pay as part of their planning consent...
I must have misunderstood. I thought you meant remove the need for archaeological impact assessment and remove the county archaeologists...i.e. remove archaeology from the planning process??