2nd April 2014, 08:27 PM
still seem to be gathering evidence but could it be that being a member of the ifa is pointless...they seem to go out of their way to make it so.
Looking back at their ten year plan they made being chartered a minor point with no subsequent consequence along the lines of "once we are chartered you will be able to work anywhere in Europe as an archaeologist". Instead what we have is that being a member of the chartered institute of archaeology has established that you are predominantly self certified seconded by somebody know knows you and nothing to do with a graduate system because we see archaeology as a voluntary education past time to be administered by public servants...and probably will not be recognised across Europe. They certainly are not trying to attract more diggers to join are they?
what does this mean
Looking back at their ten year plan they made being chartered a minor point with no subsequent consequence along the lines of "once we are chartered you will be able to work anywhere in Europe as an archaeologist". Instead what we have is that being a member of the chartered institute of archaeology has established that you are predominantly self certified seconded by somebody know knows you and nothing to do with a graduate system because we see archaeology as a voluntary education past time to be administered by public servants...and probably will not be recognised across Europe. They certainly are not trying to attract more diggers to join are they?
what does this mean
Quote:degrees need to be transferable to allow people to change their mind and develop. practical archaeology qualifications overseen by commercial interests are the way forward
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist