11th April 2014, 09:12 AM
Presumably each mattock load could be called a context and a spit could be called a context.
Going back to my arrow, when we have a piece of pottery in a context we normally use the pot to date the context when we know that the pot was made before the context (and any glaze that is on the pot was applied after the pot was formed). All pot is inherently residual except when its contamination. Am off to think about the use of Bergers arrows to sort that mess out.
Going back to my arrow, when we have a piece of pottery in a context we normally use the pot to date the context when we know that the pot was made before the context (and any glaze that is on the pot was applied after the pot was formed). All pot is inherently residual except when its contamination. Am off to think about the use of Bergers arrows to sort that mess out.
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist