21st April 2014, 07:02 PM
"It's easy to prove neo pits aren't there." Are you saying that this will lead to proof that the neos would not place a pit or pits "there". What are we talking about: 10yr2/1 soil when found between a fork in a river looking east with a hill over looking it from the north. Was this some kind of a taboo place found in no ones land between the territory of three Tribes one of which had elongated skulls. I would tend to worry that the neos did not place pits in "most" places. Wouldn't it be more straight forward working on the places where neo pits have been found and trying to spot the similarities between them and then testing this theory of similarity by finding other like places and post-dicting place of neo pit. And then it also turns out not all neo pits are the same thing....I am of the theory that most neo pits were Melolontha melolontha traps http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXmserp6ZGs. Obviously where you find one of these cockchafer pits I predict that there would have been a beech tree nearby in the Neolithic http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12146792
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist