IfA to be abolished and replaced by......

[Marc Berger]

I am not sure that it's got nothing to do with chartered status, presumably if we were cmifa we would know if neopits undertook sexual reproduction with all the inherent evolutionary consequences that that entails. What we are trying to do is what find out what con/dem granted chartered archaeologist status gets the members of ifa. Having a chat about neopits is the equivalent of blowing raspberries in the general direction. As per article three of the Valetta convention does what ever conviction on neopits give anybody ascendancy on the right to impose post determination conditions on TCPA? We have ascertained from the qualifications required to obtain cmifa that graduate certificates are decidedly excluded and so may make academic authority irrelevant.

All your insistence that neopits have importance makes me want to know if there are neopits which are not important and how can we discount them from our searches? I personally don't care about neopits distribution one bit. What i would say that I care about is digging a pit. What I often do is to split contexts top middle bottom on the off chance that I might have missed a context change. I also do this to try to isolate the area of the context boundary because that seems to be where most things happen. It's a bit arbitrary because it relies on predicting how thick the context is and a bit of working all the way round the pit and fully excavating using single context planning.