11th June 2014, 03:14 PM
Indeed... you get what you get on the packet. and there ws a range of speakers, based on the range of speakers who offered. SOrry that my jovial ramblings made you froth.... but then I actually do what I talk about as well. ( as do those who appeared on the vids) Doug does this ( massive ammount of work) out of the goodness of his heart. And I for one would like to publicly thank him for these ... as I have found it helpful as well.
To be honest, I was more coherent than I thought I was. Simple question... can public archaeology and research agendas mesh... YES... when carried out in partnership with professionals ( of all hues) and with defined aims and outcomes. All knowledge is good, knowledge and engagement is better knowledge, engagement, and long term impacts in a range of subjects from art to edjamakashun is the best. It is a win win win scenario. but obviously does not suit all flavours of archaeology or archaeologists.
To be honest, I was more coherent than I thought I was. Simple question... can public archaeology and research agendas mesh... YES... when carried out in partnership with professionals ( of all hues) and with defined aims and outcomes. All knowledge is good, knowledge and engagement is better knowledge, engagement, and long term impacts in a range of subjects from art to edjamakashun is the best. It is a win win win scenario. but obviously does not suit all flavours of archaeology or archaeologists.