24th June 2014, 11:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 24th June 2014, 11:58 AM by Marc Berger.)
It also shows that even if there has been an evaluation that there's still room for complaint*...and that the complaints will be about technical issues like sample size, distribution and experience. Where as with heritage assets, dbas and heritage statements, eia everything is pure pontificating speculation. All the landowner has to do with the local historian is get the archaeologists to explain the methods employed. Why didn't the journalist interview the archaeologist?
* maybe that is one area where there is a problem -a stage in the planning process where evaluation data can be critically assessed. Evaluations were intended to inform a tendering process for excavation. Who evaluated Dinos site....
* maybe that is one area where there is a problem -a stage in the planning process where evaluation data can be critically assessed. Evaluations were intended to inform a tendering process for excavation. Who evaluated Dinos site....
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist