28th August 2014, 11:36 AM
the jist of which, buried within the slavery of Bona vacantia that everything lost belongs to the queen and lord treasurers Remembrancer and the question within corporeal moveables whether skeletons and property buried with a dead person could be regarded as ownerless and therefore ultimately the property of the Crown like any other lost object as all objects that were once owned can only stay owned or lost and if lost then they belong to the crown has meant that reburial is not the automatic choice but something which they can use the archaeologists as an excuse not to rebury and though the scots also don't seem to have a qualified archaeologist defined and as in archaeologyexile document like to go on and on about what an imaginary archaeologist would like. They kinda get to the result that I like that reburial is ridiculous but for all the wrong reasons.
Presumably reburial would be an attempt to lose something-is it legal to lose something that belongs to the crown in Scotland?
.
Presumably reburial would be an attempt to lose something-is it legal to lose something that belongs to the crown in Scotland?
.
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist