16th December 2014, 11:55 AM
although I might of over egged the evaluation isn't an excavation maybe another way of putting this view from the self employed against the salaried world is would you think it is a good idea to undertake an excavation based on an evaluation carried out by somebody on some "pay minima"? As far as I see it if you have a "pay" structure which basses it financial predictions on an assessment process (like an evaluation) but then that assessment leads to a system of "salaried pay" based around "excavation" but that its system of "pay" is consistently being considered to be wholly inadequate by bajr or the ifa then either the evaluation system is not doing its "job" or the salaried system is not suitable to the assessment system....
On one side paying the minima would conform to the PPG16 view that an evaluation is a an inexpensive method and presumably the minima of the lowest grade member would suffice. The ifa (lets have a agreement on bajr that we will never call them cifa or is that sypha) but the ifa set the guidance's with a members are not equal or rather some members are more equal than others. They have got their new charter colours up on their web pages for salaries http://www.archaeologists.net/practices/salary but there is little mention of evaluation on it which isn't odd because they just don't get it because they are still trying to ram a public service salaried pension denial that the world they are trying to fight, which is that archaeologists should be self employed, is actually at this very moment shoving everybody down zero hours contracts and from what I understand the zero is a total two fingers up to salaries. Another thing about the ifa and jobs to remember is that unlike bajr they charge people to access their jobs adverts and they don't recognise their own pay minimas (?).
Where I might be misleading myself is that zeros hours contracts might be a good thing for claiming "benefits" where as being self employed is most certainly not good for claiming benefits (or rather its bloody difficult to get good support and advice from the ifa on being self employed). Does the benefits system suffer two week zero hour contracts? Possibly what I should do is set up a limited company and employ myself on zero hour contracts?
Quote:the formulation of a strategy to initiate a threat to the archaeological resourceha ha seems to have been dragged around a lot of the web like http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/files/1...ations.doc.
although I might of over egged the evaluation isn't an excavation maybe another way of putting this view from the self employed against the salaried world is would you think it is a good idea to undertake an excavation based on an evaluation carried out by somebody on some "pay minima"? As far as I see it if you have a "pay" structure which basses it financial predictions on an assessment process (like an evaluation) but then that assessment leads to a system of "salaried pay" based around "excavation" but that its system of "pay" is consistently being considered to be wholly inadequate by bajr or the ifa then either the evaluation system is not doing its "job" or the salaried system is not suitable to the assessment system....
On one side paying the minima would conform to the PPG16 view that an evaluation is a an inexpensive method and presumably the minima of the lowest grade member would suffice. The ifa (lets have a agreement on bajr that we will never call them cifa or is that sypha) but the ifa set the guidance's with a members are not equal or rather some members are more equal than others. They have got their new charter colours up on their web pages for salaries http://www.archaeologists.net/practices/salary but there is little mention of evaluation on it which isn't odd because they just don't get it because they are still trying to ram a public service salaried pension denial that the world they are trying to fight, which is that archaeologists should be self employed, is actually at this very moment shoving everybody down zero hours contracts and from what I understand the zero is a total two fingers up to salaries. Another thing about the ifa and jobs to remember is that unlike bajr they charge people to access their jobs adverts and they don't recognise their own pay minimas (?).
Where I might be misleading myself is that zeros hours contracts might be a good thing for claiming "benefits" where as being self employed is most certainly not good for claiming benefits (or rather its bloody difficult to get good support and advice from the ifa on being self employed). Does the benefits system suffer two week zero hour contracts? Possibly what I should do is set up a limited company and employ myself on zero hour contracts?
Quote:The archaeology is there before we get there........an evaluation should evaluate any archaeological remains present. Or at least evaluate the presence of archaeology.how do you know that its there before you get there? you on some pay minima or something
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist