14th June 2015, 12:52 PM
cIFA guide reads ok on paper, given that it just a rehash of the kinds of advice that Counties and numerous other bodies already give... - shame all they have is words and no ability deal with real issues about archaeology
Again, the cIFA should not be involved in planning here (unless they are trying to replace the Public Servants...) - certainly not before providing a robust method of measuring archaeological outcomes, which it clearly (IMO) has failed to do.
I prefer BAJR guide - it has integrity
Again, the cIFA should not be involved in planning here (unless they are trying to replace the Public Servants...) - certainly not before providing a robust method of measuring archaeological outcomes, which it clearly (IMO) has failed to do.
I prefer BAJR guide - it has integrity