13th May 2015, 08:52 AM
sandal on bajr. I can only apologise hosty for I know not what. I think that you have edited out a quote about not valuing archaeology that a council has gone out of its way to say in its yearly public account. I have then tried to work out who owns access to the archaeology archives and what they do all day which appears to be worry about pensions and austerity and distort the wedding industry. The thing is that field archaeologists are the ultimate product of austerity. The Treasury started separating us from our archives even before ppg16 times and we are now in the situation where we cant give any to pdurdin. It noticeable that nobody on bajr has "volunteered" any
hello hosty we don't often see you much round these parts. Definitely don't see any other moderators. Its all very virtual. Have you got any thoughts on pdurdin trying to get access to local archives. You dont think that "they" are only going to give pdurdin access by charging for access? Bit like they charge tuition fee for teaching archaeology to students? Whats ifas official line. I would have thought that its about time that they want all artefacts to belong to the crown like its does in Scotland.
hello hosty we don't often see you much round these parts. Definitely don't see any other moderators. Its all very virtual. Have you got any thoughts on pdurdin trying to get access to local archives. You dont think that "they" are only going to give pdurdin access by charging for access? Bit like they charge tuition fee for teaching archaeology to students? Whats ifas official line. I would have thought that its about time that they want all artefacts to belong to the crown like its does in Scotland.
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist