4th May 2015, 01:15 PM
Shameful, which standard is that then. Archaeology done purely for money is a precise account on which full tax should be paid. Anything else is vanity and I expect tax avoidance or evasion. Are you saying that a fellow archaeologist of yours took money but did not produce a product to the value that they charged?
I am interested in what insurance you believe could be sort for this situation? Are you talking about the accuser or the defendant? (Onan might have been interested in this insurance having paid with his life for interrupting his coitus with his brothers wife)
I am interested in what insurance you believe could be sort for this situation? Are you talking about the accuser or the defendant? (Onan might have been interested in this insurance having paid with his life for interrupting his coitus with his brothers wife)
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist