17th October 2008, 11:08 AM
The jobs section is total cobblers though (and...er... was the IFAs own JIS - they have been informed )
At my request the link was removed... I did not want BAJRs name associated
It is a fine line to walk, for me, as David I was p#ssd at the blatant image theft (and baffling denials), I was annoyed on behalf of others who had content and images taken...
I was not too worried at the job section, - that's fair enough.. (even if part of the content was JIS) and could even by pleased at the compliment of using the same RSS feeds and search terms as BAJR has. (Coincidence I am sure)
As BAJR however, it is part of my duty to protect (perhaps sometimes my cape is too frayed and my pants of righteousness too tight)... BUT... at the end of the day, If I have concerns, its not because I worry about Past Horizons losing the sale of a few trowels or for any personal reasons, it is because of discussions with people and organisations who have known them and the actions that have taken place now. They are not bad people at all - they have however started out on the wrong foot , and instead of taking a deep breath, have gone for the "brazen it out and deny everything" senario - even if this looks more and more unsure.
They want to come here and defend themselves - I seriously don't believe it would make any difference.
It takes time to build a new business and time to build relationships. Lets see what time shows.
They have said they are "Currently awaiting Charity Status Approval and recognition from the CBA" so lets take them at their word, and wish a community project luck.
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers
At my request the link was removed... I did not want BAJRs name associated
It is a fine line to walk, for me, as David I was p#ssd at the blatant image theft (and baffling denials), I was annoyed on behalf of others who had content and images taken...
I was not too worried at the job section, - that's fair enough.. (even if part of the content was JIS) and could even by pleased at the compliment of using the same RSS feeds and search terms as BAJR has. (Coincidence I am sure)
As BAJR however, it is part of my duty to protect (perhaps sometimes my cape is too frayed and my pants of righteousness too tight)... BUT... at the end of the day, If I have concerns, its not because I worry about Past Horizons losing the sale of a few trowels or for any personal reasons, it is because of discussions with people and organisations who have known them and the actions that have taken place now. They are not bad people at all - they have however started out on the wrong foot , and instead of taking a deep breath, have gone for the "brazen it out and deny everything" senario - even if this looks more and more unsure.
They want to come here and defend themselves - I seriously don't believe it would make any difference.
It takes time to build a new business and time to build relationships. Lets see what time shows.
They have said they are "Currently awaiting Charity Status Approval and recognition from the CBA" so lets take them at their word, and wish a community project luck.
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers