15th October 2015, 02:25 PM
To be safe my local Planning authority have an unwritten arrangement with the County that was "arranged" in 1990 for archaeological services. That it was not recorded, and even its title is obscure and in accounts is referred to as N/A, and has not been reviewed since 1990, means that both county and district don't know what to think. I would suggest that to be safe the L in LPA should mean local and LPAs should be resistant to contradictions.
Does anybody know what have been the outcomes of the removal of archaeological advice for LPAs in West Sussex? It would be nice to imagine that the Local Government Ombudsman has insisted that each LPA retained and provided a local HER and employed local archaeological advice based in a local Archaeological Museum. Presumably to get that to happen would need somebody to go through a complaints procedure.
As you came through the door you would immediately be transfixed by my three fluted jug handle typology series.
Does anybody know what have been the outcomes of the removal of archaeological advice for LPAs in West Sussex? It would be nice to imagine that the Local Government Ombudsman has insisted that each LPA retained and provided a local HER and employed local archaeological advice based in a local Archaeological Museum. Presumably to get that to happen would need somebody to go through a complaints procedure.
As you came through the door you would immediately be transfixed by my three fluted jug handle typology series.
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist