14th March 2016, 04:43 PM
So, a GAT report is accepted as satisfactory to meet a Planning condition because the authors at GAT said it is? Sounds like they've removed all independent quality assessment from the system - which is distinctly good news for GAT!
And when recommending or choosing an archaelogical contractor, the curator (at GAT) can show preference to GAT? How convenient!
Nothing like robust accountability...
And when recommending or choosing an archaelogical contractor, the curator (at GAT) can show preference to GAT? How convenient!
Nothing like robust accountability...