5th August 2008, 02:23 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by mercenary
I should point out that there is no suggestion at all that the LA is trying to make it hard for me to work in their patch. (I am currently doing so in fact, just unlikely to produce the report.) I would be shocked if they were because I have always had a very good relationship with the relevant development control archaeologists.
But, in addition to the difficulty of providing reports [u]before</u> I get on the lists, it does seem to take it beyond a list of contractors towards an approved list, which I have always understood to be legally very shaky.
I'm not sure if it is any consolation Teamonster, I need all the nibbles I can get right now.B)
It's difficult to know what to suggest on this one, as I can see the problem with not being able to supply previous reports under your own company name. If this is an attempt to ensure that there is quality control, perhaps some excavation, finds and recording manuals and a mock up of the structure of a report might work?