27th October 2008, 09:37 AM
It seems we are the only archaeology forum in the UK actually talking about this.. and its relation to the trade in antiquities. As you will know, I can't ever agree with it... and am surprised that some people think this is a 'pro-collecting' site. I am supportive of those that share and enhance our knowledge, and disagree continually with the sale of artifacts in general, however, if an item is 'surplus' or in such quantities as to be ubiquitous, and useful information has been recovered.. what then? Regulation is required... Pressure applied .. understanding of the parameters
As humans we are inveterate collectors.. it is what we collect, the responsibility attached to it, and how we collect. Damaging a resource just to have a small part of it is indefensible.... whether ivory nik-nak or sumerian tablet. Whether viking grave or old book, cut up for tourist tat.
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers
As humans we are inveterate collectors.. it is what we collect, the responsibility attached to it, and how we collect. Damaging a resource just to have a small part of it is indefensible.... whether ivory nik-nak or sumerian tablet. Whether viking grave or old book, cut up for tourist tat.
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers