5th December 2008, 11:51 AM
I think this bill only really stood a chance of being introduced during times of plenty, in a recession any thing that smacks of being a luxory or indulgence was going to be dropped.
After all-how many people in the government would be saying we should be looking forward to the future and not back to the past?
After all-how many people in the government would be saying we should be looking forward to the future and not back to the past?