20th December 2008, 11:21 AM
1man, this is very good poll-two worrying thoughts spring to mind on the results
1-With any site crew the person in charge is supposed to be checking the work done by the crew,and if they are allowing a lot of shoddy work to be done then that is an indictment on the quality of some site directors.
2-All sites are then supposed to be monitored by the local curator/community archaeologist,and if they are allowing shoddy work to get by them then this is an indictment against some of them as well:face-huh:
I voted for number 4.
1-With any site crew the person in charge is supposed to be checking the work done by the crew,and if they are allowing a lot of shoddy work to be done then that is an indictment on the quality of some site directors.
2-All sites are then supposed to be monitored by the local curator/community archaeologist,and if they are allowing shoddy work to get by them then this is an indictment against some of them as well:face-huh:
I voted for number 4.