21st December 2008, 07:37 PM
Hi Troll,
Yep. Archaeologists are the contributing factor, and no one else. Stands to reason.
You and I both know that in the world of highly competative tendering some archaeology can be conducted to a high standard. I generally attribute this to the individuals (and sometimes the units) involved in those projects just as certain individuals (and sometimes the units) have the copro-touch.
I agree that due their vagueness and holes, the standards actually give so much flexibility that it allows and endorses poor work to take place thus fitting snuggly into the world of competative tendering.
'Mum!!! Can you get me the toilet roll, please!'
Noam Chomsky
Yep. Archaeologists are the contributing factor, and no one else. Stands to reason.
You and I both know that in the world of highly competative tendering some archaeology can be conducted to a high standard. I generally attribute this to the individuals (and sometimes the units) involved in those projects just as certain individuals (and sometimes the units) have the copro-touch.
I agree that due their vagueness and holes, the standards actually give so much flexibility that it allows and endorses poor work to take place thus fitting snuggly into the world of competative tendering.
'Mum!!! Can you get me the toilet roll, please!'
Noam Chomsky