21st April 2009, 02:45 PM
To be honest, I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. As has been posted above, the wording includes the phrase 'or equivalent' which indicates that all they are doing is setting a broad benchmark. I am far from convinced that an offence has therefore been committed.
Clearly it is implicit that a MIFA level gained through pottery studies (and what is wrong with that?) is not what is intended in the case of an excavation contract. It would be in the case of a pottery report contract of course.
Clearly it is implicit that a MIFA level gained through pottery studies (and what is wrong with that?) is not what is intended in the case of an excavation contract. It would be in the case of a pottery report contract of course.