22nd January 2009, 11:08 AM
[quote]Originally posted by RedEarth
It would also be interested to know how the 'selection of archaeological employers' was determined. Was it entirely random, or is there likely to be some bias in the figures? Why not just ask as many employers as possible?
Read the report - it tells you explicitly
Archaeological employers that are either Registered Organisations with the Institute for Archaeologists (IfA) or members of the Federation of Archaeological Managers and Employers (FAME) were sent a short questionnaire by email on 12 January 2009, asking for responses by 19 January 2009.
It would also be interested to know how the 'selection of archaeological employers' was determined. Was it entirely random, or is there likely to be some bias in the figures? Why not just ask as many employers as possible?
Read the report - it tells you explicitly
Archaeological employers that are either Registered Organisations with the Institute for Archaeologists (IfA) or members of the Federation of Archaeological Managers and Employers (FAME) were sent a short questionnaire by email on 12 January 2009, asking for responses by 19 January 2009.