10th February 2009, 02:58 PM
Posted by Oxbeast:
Curators shouldn't have a 'recommended' list, because this would open their employer to legal action for restraint of trade from anyone not on the list. They can't delete people from the list for the same reason.
They could, potentially, restrict the list to RAOs, but that may then exclude good local units that haven't chosen to be RAOs, and of course not all curators are fans of the IFA.
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished
Quote:quote:What is the point of county lists if they are not recommendations?The point of the list is that an archaeological planning condition often leads the developer to ask the curator to identify potential contractors. The curator can then issue the list, saying something like 'this is a list of contractors who do this type of work in this area. Inclusion on the list is not a recommendation'.
Curators shouldn't have a 'recommended' list, because this would open their employer to legal action for restraint of trade from anyone not on the list. They can't delete people from the list for the same reason.
They could, potentially, restrict the list to RAOs, but that may then exclude good local units that haven't chosen to be RAOs, and of course not all curators are fans of the IFA.
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished