10th August 2009, 12:03 AM
HE12.1
Local planning authorities should use the following criteria to determine whether
the benefits of an application for enabling development to secure the future
conservation of a heritage asset outweigh the disbenefits of departing from the
development plan, bearing in mind the requirements of section 38(6) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 200415.
? Will it materially harm the significance of the asset or its setting?
? Will it avoid detrimental fragmentation of management of the asset?
? Will it secure the long term future of the asset and, where applicable, its
continued use for a purpose sympathetic to its conservation?
? Is it necessary to resolve problems arising from the inherent needs of the asset,
rather than the circumstances of the present owner, or the purchase price paid?
? Is there a source of funding that might support the asset without the need for
enabling development?
? Is the level of development the minimum necessary to secure the future
conservation of the asset and of the design and type that minimises harm to
other public interests?
YP-
so no wasting money if the other stakeholders are too beligerant or uneconomical for winning grants through public interest or financial return through development
txt is
Mike
Local planning authorities should use the following criteria to determine whether
the benefits of an application for enabling development to secure the future
conservation of a heritage asset outweigh the disbenefits of departing from the
development plan, bearing in mind the requirements of section 38(6) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 200415.
? Will it materially harm the significance of the asset or its setting?
? Will it avoid detrimental fragmentation of management of the asset?
? Will it secure the long term future of the asset and, where applicable, its
continued use for a purpose sympathetic to its conservation?
? Is it necessary to resolve problems arising from the inherent needs of the asset,
rather than the circumstances of the present owner, or the purchase price paid?
? Is there a source of funding that might support the asset without the need for
enabling development?
? Is the level of development the minimum necessary to secure the future
conservation of the asset and of the design and type that minimises harm to
other public interests?
YP-
so no wasting money if the other stakeholders are too beligerant or uneconomical for winning grants through public interest or financial return through development
txt is
Mike