4th November 2009, 08:32 PM
Welcome back Peter... where you been!
That is indeed something I can agree with... but there is too much that is waffle... though I have been told that should in legal terms means 'must' (though personally I can't beleive that!)
"good idea but impractical." Your response to Para 64.. which really sums it up... (I myself had a similar text in my briefs when I was a planning arch) and indeed it was nice but no.
in fact... the draft is just like that good idea but impractical!
drpeterwardle Wrote:I may be a minority but generally it is a step in the right direction. Of course it is more about buildings and all the other heritage assets - archaeology is but a part of the historic environment.
That is indeed something I can agree with... but there is too much that is waffle... though I have been told that should in legal terms means 'must' (though personally I can't beleive that!)
"good idea but impractical." Your response to Para 64.. which really sums it up... (I myself had a similar text in my briefs when I was a planning arch) and indeed it was nice but no.
in fact... the draft is just like that good idea but impractical!
For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he
Thomas Rainborough 1647
Thomas Rainborough 1647