17th November 2009, 09:44 PM
the employers can define the define branding proceedures and liabilities
algao are in the position to know what the local region is lacking in understanding and data coverage, in relation to local gov policies
as for an emphasis in accrediation towards chartering, that is in a significant number of CoE and Euro material as the general direction they wish to take the cultural heritage sector as a whole.
employees being able to independently attain 'chartering' from their employers would enable the existence of non chartered organisations or training field schools to exist and compete on the basis of cv's and resumes
employers then become involved in wanting to push and build up the skills of the staff so as to provide a basis for competion, whilst managing liabilities on different scales and significance.
significance can be attributed along side the scientific and educational expansion of the archaeological record withinuniversities that can provide facilities to fame and employers based upon their mutual interests.
the ifa can provide benchmarking and criterial costing frameworks for skills and employment contracts where clarity is required by specialist in the potential issues arising from various employment contract forms and durations.
this would breath life into the curcuit once again, whilst also providing low level entry opportunities with real guidance requirements due to potential liabilities for orhganisations.
people could add to the valuation of their own skills by debating the benchmarking and liability of their work within different groups and sub-forums.
different accrediting organisations will be integral to enabling a broader skill base and international credibility to a chartered body, in conjunction with different educational establishments being involved in tackling their own educational requirements within training schools and upon post-ex and scientific provisions to the archaeological record as well as in providing advice.
this all sounds very perfect, but in the end nothing is or will be but it would be a start.
the only real question will be what is a system like that worth?
and more importantly....do we WANT it?
:face-huh:
algao are in the position to know what the local region is lacking in understanding and data coverage, in relation to local gov policies
as for an emphasis in accrediation towards chartering, that is in a significant number of CoE and Euro material as the general direction they wish to take the cultural heritage sector as a whole.
employees being able to independently attain 'chartering' from their employers would enable the existence of non chartered organisations or training field schools to exist and compete on the basis of cv's and resumes
employers then become involved in wanting to push and build up the skills of the staff so as to provide a basis for competion, whilst managing liabilities on different scales and significance.
significance can be attributed along side the scientific and educational expansion of the archaeological record withinuniversities that can provide facilities to fame and employers based upon their mutual interests.
the ifa can provide benchmarking and criterial costing frameworks for skills and employment contracts where clarity is required by specialist in the potential issues arising from various employment contract forms and durations.
this would breath life into the curcuit once again, whilst also providing low level entry opportunities with real guidance requirements due to potential liabilities for orhganisations.
people could add to the valuation of their own skills by debating the benchmarking and liability of their work within different groups and sub-forums.
different accrediting organisations will be integral to enabling a broader skill base and international credibility to a chartered body, in conjunction with different educational establishments being involved in tackling their own educational requirements within training schools and upon post-ex and scientific provisions to the archaeological record as well as in providing advice.
this all sounds very perfect, but in the end nothing is or will be but it would be a start.
the only real question will be what is a system like that worth?
and more importantly....do we WANT it?
:face-huh:
txt is
Mike
Mike