10th November 2008, 04:41 PM
Interesting add on to this.. is the point of view you look at it...
From the 'Scots' side... Athelstan had invaded in previous years and forced overlordship on the Scots King Constantine I... after first driving out the vikings of Yorkshire and Northumbria. and so, to save Scotland (only a few years old and a different shape from present day!) from this and from the point of view of the Vikings to regain lost territiry, taken by the Saxons, the battle is one of survival from aggresive policy of Athelstane... then you look on another BBC website
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A3483029
here is the opposite view, where the plucky saxons were defending a life from invasion...
Who is right? well both I suppose... for England it forged alliance, for Scotland it hardened the border, with Athelstane to weak to fully enforce rule over Scotland .. for the Vikings? the end of rule or hope of in the mainland England ...
Fascinating!
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers
From the 'Scots' side... Athelstan had invaded in previous years and forced overlordship on the Scots King Constantine I... after first driving out the vikings of Yorkshire and Northumbria. and so, to save Scotland (only a few years old and a different shape from present day!) from this and from the point of view of the Vikings to regain lost territiry, taken by the Saxons, the battle is one of survival from aggresive policy of Athelstane... then you look on another BBC website
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A3483029
Quote:quote:What Is Brunanburh's Legacy?
England and the essence of what it means to be English seem to be the legacy of this great battle. Athelstan succeeded in uniting all the tribes of Saxons in Wessex and Mercia, at the same time as ensuring that the seemingly inexorable march of the Vikings into England was halted and the Celts remained firmly in their place in the west of Britain.
here is the opposite view, where the plucky saxons were defending a life from invasion...
Who is right? well both I suppose... for England it forged alliance, for Scotland it hardened the border, with Athelstane to weak to fully enforce rule over Scotland .. for the Vikings? the end of rule or hope of in the mainland England ...
Fascinating!
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers