Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2005
4th February 2005, 08:02 PM
the only way I could see it working is if all sites that are even remotely likely to be developed have an evaluation done on them before any developer gets involved in order that the database can attempt to be accurate. So who exactly is going to pay for that?
++ i spend my days rummaging around in dead people ++
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2004
7th February 2005, 11:42 AM
Am I understanding this correctly?
Presumably the databases would be the SMR/HER. If a developer looked at an area defined by a polygon or something, they would get a printout of dozens of sites, both relevant and irrelevant. Is this meant to reduce the need for desktops? Or just help the planners reduce their costs by choosing areas without much stuff (i.e. archaeology) around?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2004
8th February 2005, 10:42 PM
"by providing invaluable data on the location and extent of archaeology...it will avoid each project starting from scratch in considering archaeology and will give developers an early idea of what their responsibilities are likely to be" Sounds a bit iffy to me-The data being recorded is gathered through evaluation archaeology under commercial restraints. This "snapshot" is then meant to form the main corpus of the data upon which future decisions are made-seemingly without any further, corroborative work....I don`t like this in so many ways...:face-confused:
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2004
9th February 2005, 01:59 PM
So who decides the relevance and potential of unknown sites...
god its as bad as PASTMap in SCotland... a really good tool...but never ever meant to be used for Development Control