Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2005
18th October 2005, 09:49 AM
I'd like to see training in why environmental issues are important, with a focus on archaeology as one of the more neglected environmental aspects of developments. As far as I know they are only trained in the legal issues of archaeology, rather than why we study archaeology, and why it is important to modern society.
Where?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2004
19th October 2005, 06:36 PM
Troll asked "Can someone tell me who polices planning authorities?"
It is not the planning inspectorate that polices LPA but government and the electorate at both the national and local level.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2005
20th October 2005, 09:33 AM
Sorry to Dr Pete and Troll for misinformation, misread a previous post.[:I]
(I really have worked in the field)
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2005
20th October 2005, 12:52 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by drpeterwardle
Troll asked "Can someone tell me who polices planning authorities?"
It is not the planning inspectorate that polices LPA but government and the electorate at both the national and local level.
So, how precisely do the electorate police the LPAs? In my experience the planners just ride roughshod over the concerns of local citizens, if it suits their purpose.
Cheers,
Eggbasket
Gentleman Adventurer and Antiquarian
Manners maketh the man
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2005
20th October 2005, 01:02 PM
Eggy,
LPAs have a Planning Committee or similarly named group, who ultimately vote on whether or not to accept the planning officers recommendations, which is made of elected members.
A recent example would be the refusal of the planning application for Stonehenge:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/serve...ebDoc.5437
It can go both ways.
Cheers,
ML
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2005
20th October 2005, 01:25 PM
ML,
I realise that the Planning Committee votes on the issues. However, the mem-sahib and I have stood in front of these committees on a number of occasions and stated our cases to no great effect. My point really is that elected members, once in office, have no real accountability to their electorate until the next election, by which time it is probably too late, although there are some in our local council who wince whenever the see us. I recognise that it can go both ways, but from experience I believe that more often than not little or no account is really taken of the views of the people who are most likely to be affected.
Cheers,
Eggbasket
Gentleman Adventurer and Antiquarian
Manners maketh the man
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2005
20th October 2005, 01:53 PM
Ah.......sorry if I misunderstood.[:I]
Dunno mate.....political activism...at least some of them are wincing!
good luck
ML
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2005
20th October 2005, 01:58 PM
Oh yes, they definitely wince. One of the councillors in particular always looks pained whenever he encounters us!
Of course, some of them are just so up their own backsides that they are virtually impervious.
Cheers,
Eggbasket
Gentleman Adventurer and Antiquarian
Manners maketh the man
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2004
21st October 2005, 11:50 AM
Eggy-would`nt like to be on the receivin end either! Is it true that members of the public can stand up and give a 5 min view during planning hearings?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2005
21st October 2005, 12:18 PM
If you're interested in the planning system and finding out some of the things you can and can't do, the easiest place to start is
http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/ . For the appeals process, try
http://www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk .