Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2005
17th November 2005, 07:34 PM
Yeh Im quite small too (height of course).
G
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2004
17th November 2005, 11:56 PM
Fantastic-hoards of nano types are even revealing themselves on BAJR now! Come my little ones-we have some knitting to undo!!!! Term was inspired by a certain Empire Earth game. It illustrates quite nicely how throughout history, behaviour is fairly consistant until the "nano" period when runaway economics and underhand practises are the powerful weapons in chasing empires.
As it turns out,sod the original analogy, I prefer the ones offered by you lot! How about writing a spoof article for submission to New Scientist?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2005
18th November 2005, 01:26 PM
There was an old Monty Python sketch about archaeologists of diminished stature.
Little Tim
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2005
18th November 2005, 03:23 PM
I would argue that pocket-sized archaeologists are a distinct advantage. We fit into all those tiny little features and save all you big folk from the horror of becoming wedged. [:p]
Fun-size Rich.
"Kick a megalith and it hurts."
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2005
18th November 2005, 05:34 PM
Brother Troll is right to fear the depredations of the Nano-Archaeologists, or Nanarchs as those of us in my field of study refer to them. These instruments of deception were released millenia ago as part of a deliberate program of obfuscation, refabricating the archaeostrata in an attempt to obscure the extraterrestrial influences on earth society so obvious to those of us with the open-mindedness to accept them.
How we laugh at your feeble attempts to rationalise the "Ritual behaviour" of our forebears, your pathetic intellectual flailing in the face of the patently cosmological.
Shame on you. The mockery of your colleage is surpassed in irony only by the travesty of your so-called "Interpretations" of the past.
It's ALIENS, Stupid.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2005
19th November 2005, 12:45 AM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by littleyellowidol
I would argue that pocket-sized archaeologists are a distinct advantage. We fit into all those tiny little features and save all you big folk from the horror of becoming wedged. [:p]
Fun-size Rich.
"Kick a megalith and it hurts."
And little ones are so much nearer the ground to see things when field walking

Think how far tall ones have to bend to dig, the strain on the muscular/skeletal system - make no wonder you all have bad backs
E (used to know a 5ft 1 archaeologist)
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2005
20th November 2005, 12:32 PM
I fear the nano-archaeologists - they are too strong.
Well I remember the day, some years ago, when I and another 6-footer failed to lift a big stone out of the hole. Along came a nano-archaeologist (one of the two the smallest I have ever known, under 5-foot), who lifted it easily and unaided.
I and the other bigjob crept off to hide our heads in shame...
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2005
20th November 2005, 02:54 PM
I think the technical term for such individuals is 'industrial dwarves'; translated badly from German and quickly coming into common usage on a site a while back.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2004
21st November 2005, 02:07 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by 1man1desk
I fear the nano-archaeologists - they are too strong.
Well I remember the day, some years ago, when I and another 6-footer failed to lift a big stone out of the hole. Along came a nano-archaeologist (one of the two the smallest I have ever known, under 5-foot), who lifted it easily and unaided.
I and the other bigjob crept off to hide our heads in shame...
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished
That guy used to be six foot until he started his spine-compressing party tricks
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2005
21st November 2005, 02:19 PM
Does that mean after a few years hard labour my already small stature will be diminished further?! Am I going to end up 4ft 3 instead of 5???