4th July 2013, 11:00 AM
you see folks the original Museum of London Act 1965 had a section 11 11. Board to be exempt charity for purposes of Charities Act 1960.
to me the wording alone say that what ever the "museum of London" is, it is a "board" (which I have a feeling is something that star trek have been worried about for years) anyway section 11 got repealed in 1993. So basically section 11 was taken out and nothing was put back in its place
It seems then the definition of what the board can consider itself should be in its act. which according to the 1960s act "so far as they are charities, are exempt charities". We must ask how far
There is the 1993 charities act which says
which said
Am I making sense if I say that the board of governors of the museum of London is not allowed to call themselves an exempt charity any more but that as far as they have an statutory act which actually has removed their ability to call themselves anything but a board of governors. And taking a leaf from the Heritage acts which seem to say what these ex-exempt enteritis can and cannot do, there is nothing in the Museum of Londons board of governors remit that says that they can go around creating "charities" (so far and so forth).
oh and then there is what is Northampton Archaeology. Is there somewhere in Northampton council even a back of an envelope anything which says what they are or aren't?
to me the wording alone say that what ever the "museum of London" is, it is a "board" (which I have a feeling is something that star trek have been worried about for years) anyway section 11 got repealed in 1993. So basically section 11 was taken out and nothing was put back in its place
It seems then the definition of what the board can consider itself should be in its act. which according to the 1960s act "so far as they are charities, are exempt charities". We must ask how far
There is the 1993 charities act which says
Quote:schedule 2 The following institutions, so far as they are charities, are exempt charitiesThen theres schedule 7 which reiterates that it is repealing the museum of Londons 1965 act section 11
which said
Quote:11Board to be exempt charity for purposes of Charities Act 1960Schedule 2 to the Charities Act 1960 (by virtue of which, together with section 4 of that Act, the institutions so far as they are charities, mentioned in the list contained in that Schedule are exempt charities within the meaning of that Act) shall have effect with the addition after paragraph (g) of that list of the following paragraph:—
“(h)the Board of Governors of the Museum of London”.
Am I making sense if I say that the board of governors of the museum of London is not allowed to call themselves an exempt charity any more but that as far as they have an statutory act which actually has removed their ability to call themselves anything but a board of governors. And taking a leaf from the Heritage acts which seem to say what these ex-exempt enteritis can and cannot do, there is nothing in the Museum of Londons board of governors remit that says that they can go around creating "charities" (so far and so forth).
oh and then there is what is Northampton Archaeology. Is there somewhere in Northampton council even a back of an envelope anything which says what they are or aren't?
Reason: your past is my past