Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
16th September 2013, 11:21 AM
kevin wooldridge Wrote:....however in very general terms a good ditch location in the bronze age is equally likely to be a good ditch location right through to the medieval period
rather depends on what you want to dig a ditch for!
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers
Posts: 6,009
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2017
16th September 2013, 08:45 PM
Quote:rather depends on what you want to dig a ditch for!
perfect
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
16th September 2013, 08:58 PM
They outline where the interesting stuff is? Saves all that random searching
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2006
16th September 2013, 09:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 17th September 2013, 09:46 AM by Unitof1.)
Quote:rather depends on what you want to dig a ditch for
I normally like to slot a clear section of ditch, section it and basically use it for the main phasing for the area even if it could be a recut. I always think of them as top. middle and bottom and dig them accordingly. I think that all intersections are just wrong because they are impossible mathematically to get "right" because there are always more than two explanations and cross contamination is guaranteed..
Reason: your past is my past
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
17th September 2013, 11:01 AM
Dinosaur Wrote:They outline where the interesting stuff is? Saves all that random searching
cobblers dinosaur and well you know it
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
17th September 2013, 11:03 AM
Unitof1 Wrote:I normally like to slot a clear section of ditch, section it and basically use it for the main phasing for the area even if it could be a recut. I always think of them as top. middle and bottom and dig them accordingly. I think that all intersections are just wrong because they are impossible mathematically to get "right" because there are always more than two explanations and cross contamination is guaranteed..
what if it isd entirely unrelated to everything else on the site - unit
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2006
17th September 2013, 11:16 AM
its on site already. just how do you workout that it is entirely unrelated to everything on site?
Reason: your past is my past
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2009
17th September 2013, 12:39 PM
The best answer I can give is don't believe what you read......apart from experimental data on formation processes and even then pay close attention to the starting conditions.
Better to look at the ditch you have excavated in its own setting......it's own environment, its own socio-economical/ritual (grin) setting, it's own geology, it's own chronology, it's own topography, it's own archaeological setting. And of course, interrogate it's function (or lack of) }
You can even test some theories for instance checking the levels along the bottom of your ditch to see if it would drain water and in which direction for instance.
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
17th September 2013, 12:53 PM
P Prentice Wrote:cobblers dinosaur and well you know it
Lots of good things to dig are surrounded by ditches! Roman forts, castles, lots of towns and cities, henges, cursuses, barrows, many Roman roads (ok, not surrounded, but at least they show where the thing is), some villas, iron Age enclosures, many cemeteries, roundhouses (or is that a gully?), some RB temples, England (think Offas Dyke and the Vallum count) - and on that basis Wales and Northumberland/Scotland too - hillforts etc etc....oh, and fields... Not much that isn't really...
And that's just on the British mainland
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
17th September 2013, 12:57 PM
and a lot more are not surrounded by ditches
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers