Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
17th September 2013, 01:23 PM
Surprising how many are though :face-approve:
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
17th September 2013, 03:10 PM
presumably then you will be surprised at how many are not
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
17th September 2013, 04:52 PM
Nah, asking around most of the people who actually dig sites seem to agree with me :face-approve:
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
18th September 2013, 10:56 AM
i have dug numerous unenclosed prehistoric settlements, anglo saxon cemeteries, a villa, many roman buildings, a few dmv's, discrete burials, post med buildings, and even a couple of castles with no sign of an enclosing ditch but i hear that you had a couple of really really long ditches and still failed to find anything else between them
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
18th September 2013, 11:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 18th September 2013, 12:04 PM by Dinosaur.)
Big linear earthwork mound and all the palisade stuff was probably in the way
Does a skelly count?
Admittedly the timber circle, barrows etc were merely alongside the ditches, but I'd contend that their presence aided identification?
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
18th September 2013, 01:13 PM
Dinosaur Wrote:Big linear earthwork mound and all the palisade stuff was probably in the way Does a skelly count?
Admittedly the timber circle, barrows etc were merely alongside the ditches, but I'd contend that their presence aided identification?
but not interpretation then
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2009
18th September 2013, 01:17 PM
If you include construction trenches lots more stuff is enclosed.
Also I bet your 'unenclosed' prehistoric settlements were within a field system, or boundary system.
But yeah, am becoming pedantic.........enclosure is all a matter of definition and scale
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
18th September 2013, 01:39 PM
P Prentice Wrote:but not interpretation then
Will probably go for the default that 'Monument A was there so they stuck monuments B, C and D next to it' so we could find them while digging the ditches of Monument A - 'swat everyone else does :face-approve:
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2007
18th September 2013, 06:07 PM
So we can conclude that archaeological sites are sometimes foundwithin ditches, sometimes found outside ditches, sometimes found adjacent/adjoining ditches and sometime are ditches... I'm sure Tool will have found this to be a useful and comprehensive reply!
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
18th September 2013, 06:17 PM
tmsarch Wrote:So we can conclude that archaeological sites are sometimes foundwithin ditches, sometimes found outside ditches, sometimes found adjacent/adjoining ditches and sometime are ditches... I'm sure Tool will have found this to be a useful and comprehensive reply!
I have to say I have found the replies here informative. Not always informative about ditches, but informative none the less... Oh, and immensely amusing at times. So thanks to all who have put fingers to keys. I do agree with whoever it was who said the collective noun for a group of archaeologists should be an 'argument' though.