27th November 2005, 08:21 PM
If anyone has been following the Britarch antics....
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadm...L=britarch
see At best to be professional one has to where safety equipment
also archaeology cymru website and Consultation on Liberal Party Heritage policy
plus a few others.
I am truely concerned about the next statement...
There is no question about it, my unit supplies all the equipment, transport, plus safety helmet, hivis jacket and toe capped boots.
If any unit manager questions my units policy they shouldn't be undertaking professional work on any level either.
For archaeological work on ALL occasions we where safety equipment, even when the excavation levels are slight, it looks professional. I am sick to the back teeth as archaeologists looking like tramps, after all a solicitor wouldn't be seen dead at work not wearing a suit.
Archaeologists have to look professional, such as wearing a hardhat or not, if you work for me and you don't wear safety equipment after 3 warnings your suspended on appeal. That is written into a signed contract.
The individual recently we suspended had not signed any contract so they were luckily for them treated as if them had signed a contract. If I had my way they would have been suspended.
As for unions, I wouldn't employ anyone who was a member of a union, socialist institutions fit for the waste bin.
Karl-James Langford PGDipAH, PIFA
If anyone knows this individual or you are that individual please contact me offlist on either 01620 861643 or info@bajr.org
Remembering my own AUP I would appreciate that people answer this one carefully.... but I would like to know more.
Another day another WSI?
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadm...L=britarch
see At best to be professional one has to where safety equipment
also archaeology cymru website and Consultation on Liberal Party Heritage policy
plus a few others.
I am truely concerned about the next statement...
There is no question about it, my unit supplies all the equipment, transport, plus safety helmet, hivis jacket and toe capped boots.
If any unit manager questions my units policy they shouldn't be undertaking professional work on any level either.
For archaeological work on ALL occasions we where safety equipment, even when the excavation levels are slight, it looks professional. I am sick to the back teeth as archaeologists looking like tramps, after all a solicitor wouldn't be seen dead at work not wearing a suit.
Archaeologists have to look professional, such as wearing a hardhat or not, if you work for me and you don't wear safety equipment after 3 warnings your suspended on appeal. That is written into a signed contract.
The individual recently we suspended had not signed any contract so they were luckily for them treated as if them had signed a contract. If I had my way they would have been suspended.
As for unions, I wouldn't employ anyone who was a member of a union, socialist institutions fit for the waste bin.
Karl-James Langford PGDipAH, PIFA
If anyone knows this individual or you are that individual please contact me offlist on either 01620 861643 or info@bajr.org
Remembering my own AUP I would appreciate that people answer this one carefully.... but I would like to know more.
Another day another WSI?