Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 1,153
» Latest member: BAJR
» Forum threads: 4,060
» Forum posts: 4,408
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 264 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 264 Guest(s)
|
Latest Threads |
cIFA does it again (or ra...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
14th November 2017, 09:14 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 13,300
|
Genetic analysis of old b...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
30th August 2017, 10:32 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 10,219
|
What would eh know about ...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
15th July 2017, 01:37 PM
» Replies: 15
» Views: 19,989
|
How can adequate developm...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Dinosaur
10th July 2017, 12:20 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 6,306
|
300,000 years ...Wow!
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: GnomeKing
7th June 2017, 09:52 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,670
|
Is it an Arched trench or...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: GnomeKing
25th May 2017, 05:44 PM
» Replies: 43
» Views: 46,539
|
Three Word Days
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
25th May 2017, 01:06 PM
» Replies: 598
» Views: 300,182
|
myfile
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
12th April 2017, 09:52 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 11,560
|
Recover your password
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Wax
10th April 2017, 09:54 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 27,776
|
International Heritage Vi...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
31st March 2017, 10:29 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,707
|
|
|
Time Team and Ainsbrook Hoard |
Posted by: Shorty - 14th January 2008, 10:19 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (99)
|
|
Didn't know whether to post this on the detectorist site or here. Anyway, did Yorkshire Archaeology deliberately avoid digging trenches on the sites suggested by the detectorists, simply because they were detectorists? The detectorists seemed to think so, and I was disappointed that they felt so disillusioned by the experience of working with archaeologists. What did everyone else make of the programme?
|
|
|
Aussie Archaeology |
Posted by: Digger - 14th January 2008, 05:06 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (2)
|
|
Mr Hosty!
Do you think it would be a good idea for a thread on issues in Australian, or in fact, other countries where Archaeologist deal with the study of Indigenous peoples? In Oz the issue of white euro decended archaeologists rummaging about in other peoples (read indigenous) business has always been a bit of an issue. In many cases archaeologists pride themselves on the trust they earn while working with and for various communities.
The would point out that the majority of Ozzies are well aware of previous injusts done to aboriginal peoples. The stolen generation was the result of a general government policy of removing 'half cast' children from their communities. The policy was based on the belief that aboriginals as a race would eventually become extinct and there was a duty to raise these children within white society. Children were removed forcibly based on the colour of their skin. There is some evidence that a few aboriginal communities didn't want children that were fathered by whites. All very complex and against a background of growing interest in eugenics (think 1930's and 40's).
Issues of substance abuse and domestic violence (amongst aboriginal) always seem to dominate the news as is the current media atention with child abuse in various communities. This clouds opinions on aboriginals markedly and hence the red-neck brigade. The issue of Europeans writing history based on documented evidence is another issue. Aboriginals have an oral record of traditions and history which is difficult to use in a system that bases/requires evidence on writen history (it takes little imagination to see the issues in Courts dealing with land rights claims, especially when oral traditions conflict amongst communities over land ownership).
Just a couple of things to think on.
|
|
|
Unit of One - will he ever go away? |
Posted by: BAJR Host - 12th January 2008, 06:29 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (14)
|
|
Have found the redoubtable Unit of One, Marc Berger, back to his old strangeness again... putting odd quotes and disjointed grumbles onto the BAJR Uk Archaeology Scribd Account (deposit for documents relating to archaeology)
Mucktons finest Archaeologist just won't leave us alone. I had considered letting him return... but... perhaps not?
Thoughts ?:face-huh:
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
|
|
|
CITB/CSCS Cards |
Posted by: drpeterwardle - 10th January 2008, 08:00 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (15)
|
|
Whats the current collective wisdom on CITB/CSCS cards?
Who should have them and at what grade?
How about banksmen certificates for machine watching?
Are there any online sources specific for archaeology?
Dr Peter Wardle
(This is a work question so a tenner to BAJR is somebody gives me the infomation)
|
|
|
Returning artefacts? |
Posted by: eggbasket - 9th January 2008, 07:58 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (13)
|
|
I think these people have some ideas about how we should deal with all the finds in the BM and our cultural heritage:
http://www.britishreparations.org/
Go to The Facts page and read about how they propose that we should pay the money they want. You might also want to check their facts since they are wrong on several counts.
Cheers,
Eggbasket
Gentleman Adventurer and Antique
"A great victory for rangers and hamsters everywhere. Right, Boo?" - Minsc
|
|
|
|